1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 61 L |