1991 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2005 Ford Econovan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Econovan |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1788 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |