1991 Chrysler TC vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 1991 Chrysler TC is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler TC weights approximately 238 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler TC | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chrysler | Riley |
Model | TC | RM A |
Year Released | 1991 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2870 mm |