1991 Chrysler TC vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1991 Chrysler TC is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chrysler TC (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 240. (152 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler TC weights approximately 34 kg more than 1980 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 240. (240 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1991 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Chrysler TC | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | TC | 240 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2650 mm |
