1991 Chrysler TC vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 669 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler TC. (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler TC weights approximately 394 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 719 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Chrysler TC | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotec |
Model | TC | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1150 mm |