1991 Citroen AX vs. 2007 Ford Ka
To start off, 2007 Ford Ka is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Citroen AX would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1991 Citroen AX. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1991 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Ka weights approximately 165 kg more than 1991 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Citroen AX. (73 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Citroen AX | 2007 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | AX | Ka |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 17.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 722 kg | 887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 40 L |
