1991 Citroen ZX vs. 1972 DAF 66
To start off, 1991 Citroen ZX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Citroen ZX (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Citroen ZX weights approximately 174 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Citroen ZX (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1991 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Citroen ZX | 1972 DAF 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | ZX | 66 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 46 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 75 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 826 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 42 L |
