1991 Citroen ZX vs. 1982 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1991 Citroen ZX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Citroen ZX (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 431 kg more than 1991 Citroen ZX.
Because 1982 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lincoln Continental (237 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Citroen ZX. (160 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 1982 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Citroen ZX | 1982 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | ZX | Continental |
Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |