1991 Citroen ZX vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1991 Citroen ZX. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1991 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 515 kg more than 1991 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Citroen ZX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Citroen ZX | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | ZX | Falcon |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 59 L |