1991 Dodge Colt vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Dodge Colt (91 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1991 Dodge Colt.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Dodge Colt (123 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1991 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Dodge Colt | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Colt | F1 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2210 mm |