1991 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 383 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan (235 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Grand Caravan | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
