1991 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan (235 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Dodge Grand Caravan | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Grand Caravan | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2840 mm |