1991 Eagle Summit vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Eagle Summit. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Eagle Summit would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1991 Eagle Summit. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Eagle Summit.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Eagle Summit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Eagle Summit. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Eagle Summit.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Eagle Summit | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Summit | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 3193 mm |