1991 Fiat Uno vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Fiat Uno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Fiat Uno would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1991 Fiat Uno. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Fiat Uno.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1991 Fiat Uno has manual transmission. 1991 Fiat Uno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Fiat Uno | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Uno | CTS |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 901 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 318 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |