1991 Fiat Vivace vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1991 Fiat Vivace is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Fiat Vivace (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Fiat Vivace (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1991 Fiat Vivace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Fiat Vivace | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Vivace | 66 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |