1991 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fairlane would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 660 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1991 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Clio |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2770 mm |
