1991 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Fairlane (186 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1991 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Fairlane (338 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | 5 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2760 mm |