1991 Ford Falcon vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1991 Ford Falcon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Falcon (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Falcon weights approximately 162 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Falcon | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Falcon | Renown |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3949 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1446 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |
