1991 Ford Falcon vs. 1994 Mazda Midge

To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Falcon (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Falcon weights approximately 396 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1991 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.

Compare all specifications: