1991 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1991 Ford Falcon. (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Falcon | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Falcon | Ram |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3949 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |