1991 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Renault Laguna

To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1991 Ford Falcon. (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Falcon.

Because 1991 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Laguna. (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Laguna. 2010 Renault Laguna has automatic transmission and 1991 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1991 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Laguna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: