1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1991 Ford Fiesta is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Fiesta | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Fiesta | EH |
Year Released | 1991 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |