1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 1965 Mitsubishi 500
To start off, 1991 Ford Fiesta is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Fiesta | 1965 Mitsubishi 500 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fiesta | 500 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2070 mm |