1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Fiesta | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Fiesta | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |