1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 999 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Fiesta | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Fiesta | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1820 mm |