1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Fiesta | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Fiesta | ATS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 199 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1418 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2776 mm |
