1991 Ford Fiesta vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Fiesta | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Fiesta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2880 mm |
