1991 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 1991 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Mustang weights approximately 245 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Mustang | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 220 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
