1991 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Mustang | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Mustang | Outback |
Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |