1991 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Tata E220

To start off, 1996 Tata E220 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Tata E220 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Tata E220 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Tata E220 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Tata E220 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Ford Mustang 1996 Tata E220
Make Ford Tata
Model Mustang E220
Year Released 1991 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2301 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1260 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2810 mm