1991 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 1991 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Mustang | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Carina |
Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 23.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |