1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Mustang weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Mustang (183 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1991 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Mustang | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Mustang | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2500 mm |