1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 85 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Because 1991 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Mustang | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | CU-X |
Year Released | 1991 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |