1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Mustang (183 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1991 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Mustang | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | F1 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
