1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Mustang | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Mustang | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
