1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Mustang | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Colt |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 95 L |