1991 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 557 kg more than 1991 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1991 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Ford Mustang 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Ford Cadillac
Model Mustang XTS
Year Released 1991 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2301 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1260 kg 1817 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]