1991 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1991 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Ranger | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3970 mm |
