1991 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Ranger | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | Apollo |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4510 mm |
