1991 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Tata Estate
To start off, 2000 Tata Estate is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Tata Estate. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Ranger | 2000 Tata Estate | |
| Make | Ford | Tata |
| Model | Ranger | Estate |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4630 mm |
