1991 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Ranger | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | 6 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4690 mm |
