1991 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Ranger | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 6 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4710 mm |