1991 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1991 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1991 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Ranger | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Ranger | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4498 mm |
