1991 Ford Sierra vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 1,751 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Sierra (75 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Sierra weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Sierra (152 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Sierra | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Sierra | R2 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1751 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |