1991 Ford Sierra vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1991 Ford Sierra. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Sierra.
Because 1991 Ford Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Sierra (123 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1991 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Sierra | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Sierra | Micra |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2449 mm |