1991 Ford Taurus vs. 1952 Renault Colorale
To start off, 1991 Ford Taurus is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Taurus (89 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1952 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Colorale weights approximately 210 kg more than 1991 Ford Taurus.
Because 1952 Renault Colorale is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Colorale. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Taurus | 1952 Renault Colorale | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Taurus | Colorale |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2512 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 45 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
