1991 Ford Taurus vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma

To start off, 1991 Ford Taurus is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Taurus weights approximately 330 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.

Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Taurus (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Ford Taurus 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Taurus Sigma
Year Released 1991 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2512 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2520 mm