1991 Ford Taurus vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1991 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Taurus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Taurus. (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Taurus | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2512 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |