1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2002 Fiat Siena is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Siena (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Siena should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Tempo weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Fiat Siena.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Fiat Siena. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Tempo | 2002 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | Tempo | Siena |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2305 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |