1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 175 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Tempo | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Tempo | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2305 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2390 mm |
